Free HVAC Design Checklist (Manual J, S & D)

Build and download a free residential HVAC design review — design conditions, Manual J loads, the equipment you selected, and the duct design. It grades selected capacity against the published ACCA Manual S limits and derives the Manual D friction rate from your available static pressure, so the sheet tells you whether the design holds up rather than just recording that you did one. PDF, Excel, or Word export.

Where should we send it?

Add your email to download this template. It is free, and you only have to do this once.

We use it to send you the occasional template and product update. See our privacy policy.

Build your HVAC design review

Record the loads and what you selected against them. The sizing ratios grade themselves against the published ACCA Manual S limits, and the Manual D friction rate falls out of your available static pressure.

HVAC Design Checklist

Furnace + AC (split) · 09/11/2026

Outstanding

22

1Project & design conditionsThe conditions every load and capacity figure below is stated at.
Project name
Review date
Designer
Load softwareoptional
Design location / weather station
Outdoor heating (99%)
°F DB
Outdoor cooling (1%)
°F DB
Outdoor cooling WB
°F WB
Indoor heating
°F
Indoor cooling
°F
Indoor cooling RH
%
Conditioned area
ft²
Bedrooms
Site elevation
ft
Client & siteNothing set
Designer license / certification #optional
Company detailsNothing set
2Manual J — calculated loadsSplit the cooling load. A total on its own cannot be checked for a latent shortfall.
Heating load
Btu/h
Cooling sensible load
Btu/h
Cooling latent load
Btu/h
3Manual S — equipment selectionGradedCapacity at the design conditions, graded against the published range.
System type
Make & modeloptional
AHRI reference #optional

Cooling capacity at design

Selected total
Btu/h
Selected sensible
Btu/h
Selected latent
Btu/h

Heating capacity at design

Listed output capacity
Btu/h
4Manual D — available static & friction rateAuto-calculatedWhat is left of the blower rating once the components take their share.
Design airflow
CFM
Blower rated ESP
in. w.c.
Coil drop
in. w.c.
Filter drop
in. w.c.
Other component drops
in. w.c.
Supply effective length
ft
Return effective length
ft
5Ventilation (ASHRAE 62.2)The whole-house rate the dwelling has to be designed for.
Designed ventilation rate
CFM

Enter the conditioned floor area in step 1 to compute the required rate.

6Design review checklistHow the figures above were arrived at, and what the permit set carries.
Load calculation (Manual J)6 checks

What the load was actually calculated from.

Room-by-room loads calculated, not a whole-house block load
Loads run for the building’s actual directional orientation
No safety factor, future-expansion allowance or padding added
Equipment selection (Manual S)5 checks

How the capacity figures above were arrived at.

Capacity read off the manufacturer’s expanded performance data at the design conditions
Selection is an AHRI-certified matched combination, reference number recorded
Sensible and latent capacities each checked against their own load
Duct design (Manual D)6 checks

What the duct sizes were derived from.

Friction rate computed from available static pressure, not assumed
Total effective length includes fitting equivalent lengths, not just straight duct
Coil, filter and accessory drops taken from manufacturer data at the design airflow
Documentation & code5 checks

What the permit set has to carry.

Manual J load report submitted with the permit application
Manual S selection sheet submitted, showing capacity at design conditions
Manual D duct layout with sizes and the friction rate used

Add to your review:

Download your design review:

Free · no signup · fully editable

What's included

  • Selected cooling capacity graded against the published Manual S range — 95% to 115% of the Manual J design total heat gain for an air conditioner, 100% to 125% for a heat pump
  • Furnace and boiler output graded against the 100% to 140% Manual S heating range, using the listed output rating rather than the input
  • Sensible and latent capacity checked separately against their own loads, because a unit that clears the total load can still be short on latent and leave a humid house at setpoint
  • A heat pump’s heating output reported as coverage plus the supplemental heat the balance leaves — never scored as oversizing, because that capacity follows from the cooling selection
  • Available static pressure derived from the blower’s rated ESP less the coil, filter and accessory drops, then the Manual D friction rate from available static and total effective length
  • ASHRAE 62.2 whole-house ventilation rate computed from floor area and bedrooms, with the infiltration credit named rather than ignored
  • Square feet per ton reported as an outcome of the calculation and never graded, because no published limit exists — the rules of thumb are not one
  • The IRC M1401.3 variable-capacity exception recorded as a documentation burden, not treated as blanket permission to oversize
  • A 23-item design review checklist across Manual J, Manual S, Manual D and permit documentation, each item carrying its citation
  • Everything out of limit collected into one list at the top of every export
  • Export to PDF, Excel (.xlsx), or Word (.docx)

How to use this template

  1. 1

    Enter the design conditions

    The ASHRAE 99% heating and 1% cooling dry bulbs for the nearest weather station — not the record low and record high. The Manual J indoor conditions of 70°F heating and 75°F cooling at 50% RH are pre-filled, because those are the standard’s own values.

  2. 2

    Record the Manual J result

    Heating load, and the cooling load split into sensible and latent. The split is not optional here: it is the only way to catch the latent shortfall that ruins humid-climate installs, and a total on its own cannot be checked for it.

  3. 3

    Enter what you actually selected

    Capacity read off the manufacturer’s expanded performance data at your design conditions, not the nameplate tonnage. The sizing ratio grades itself against the applicable Manual S range as you type.

  4. 4

    Work through the duct design

    Blower rated external static pressure, then the coil, filter and accessory drops that come off it. Add the supply and return total effective lengths and the friction rate falls out — the number every duct size is then read from.

  5. 5

    Verify the review checklist

    Manual J inputs, Manual S method, Manual D derivation, and what the permit set has to carry. Mark each verified, not met, or not applicable, and note anything the reviewer needs to see.

  6. 6

    Download it

    Export to PDF, Excel or Word. Anything out of limit appears at the top, above the detail — a design review that buries its failures on page three is a review nobody acts on.

Why "400 square feet per ton" is not a sizing method

Almost every residential system in the country was sized by one of two methods: an ACCA Manual J load calculation, or a rule of thumb that divides the floor area by a number somewhere between 400 and 600 square feet per ton. The second one is still the majority, and it is not a shortcut to the first — it is a different answer entirely. Energy Vanguard published the results of 40 real load calculations against that band: not a single one landed inside it. The tightest house came out at 624 square feet per ton, most were above 1,000, and the sample averaged 1,431. Sizing at 500 square feet per ton on that sample produces equipment two to three times larger than the load.

This matters more than it sounds, because oversized cooling does not fail loudly. It satisfies the thermostat quickly, which is what a homeowner asks for, and then short-cycles — the compressor stops before the coil has run long enough to condense meaningful moisture out of the air. The house hits 75°F and sits at 60% relative humidity, and everybody blames the equipment. That is why ACCA Manual S caps an air conditioner at 115% of the Manual J design total heat gain and floors it at 95%, why a heat pump gets a wider 100% to 125% range only because its heating output has to come from somewhere, and why a furnace runs 100% to 140% of the design heat loss. Those four ratios are the whole of the selection rule, and this builder grades your entry against whichever one applies.

The code has caught up with the manuals. IRC M1401.3 in both the 2021 and 2024 editions requires heating and cooling equipment to be sized in accordance with ACCA Manual S based on loads calculated in accordance with ACCA Manual J or another approved method, and IECC R403.7 repeats it while adding a sentence most contractors have never read: the code "does not allow designer safety factors, provisions for future expansion or other factors that affect equipment sizing". A rule of thumb is not an approved methodology, and the pad you add on top of a correct Manual J is prohibited outright. This checklist therefore computes square feet per ton and prints it — labelled as an outcome of the calculation, next to the Manual S ratio that actually decided the verdict — and grades it against nothing at all, because there is no published limit to grade it against.

The same discipline runs through the duct side. Manual D sizes every duct from a friction rate, and the friction rate is available static pressure times 100 divided by total effective length. Available static is what is left of the blower’s rated external static pressure once the coil, the filter and every accessory has taken its share; total effective length is the straight duct plus the equivalent lengths of the fittings on the critical path, supply and return. The number that comes out is specific to that blower, that coil, that filter and that layout — which is exactly why assuming 0.10 inches of water column per 100 feet, as most designers do, is the most common Manual D error. This builder computes it, prints it, and refuses to grade it against a band, because Manual D publishes no pass/fail range for it. What it does flag is the one unambiguous failure: a component stack that consumes everything the blower is rated for, leaving nothing to move air through any duct at all.

Related templates

More free downloads for your HVAC template library.

Design Checklist FAQs

How much can I oversize an air conditioner?

ACCA Manual S puts an air conditioner between 95% and 115% of the Manual J design total heat gain. The 115% ceiling is also in code — IECC R403.7 limits cooling equipment to "not more than 1.15 times greater than the total load calculated". A heat pump gets 100% to 125%, and that wider range exists only because the heating side has to come out of the same selection, not because heat pumps tolerate oversizing better. Note that some jurisdictions amend the heat pump allowance back down to 115%, so check the AHJ before you lean on the 125%. This builder grades your entry against whichever range applies and treats the ceilings as inclusive, because "not more than 1.15 times" means exactly 115.0% is compliant.

No, and it is not a rule this builder will grade anything against. It is not published anywhere as a limit, it is not an approved methodology under IRC M1401.3, and it is wrong by a large margin on real houses. Across 40 published load calculations, none landed inside the 400 to 600 square feet per ton band, the tightest was 624 and the average was 1,431. The builder computes square feet per ton from your selected capacity and prints it as an outcome so you can see what the design actually worked out at — a well-designed house frequently lands somewhere the rule of thumb would call impossible.

Because total capacity is the check that misses the failure. A unit’s rated total capacity splits between sensible and latent, and that split moves with entering wet bulb and with airflow — so a selection can cover the total load and still fall short on latent. In a dry climate you never notice. In a humid one the system satisfies the thermostat, stops, and leaves the house clammy, and no amount of thermostat fiddling fixes it. Manual S requires the selected sensible capacity to cover the sensible load and the selected latent capacity to cover the latent load, both read from the manufacturer’s expanded performance data at your design conditions. This builder checks both, and it will tell you a selection is short on latent even when the total ratio reads comfortably inside 115%.

In every jurisdiction on the IRC, yes. Section M1401.3 of both the 2021 and 2024 IRC requires heating and cooling equipment to be sized in accordance with ACCA Manual S based on building loads calculated in accordance with ACCA Manual J or other approved methodologies, and IECC R403.7 says the same for energy-code compliance. Most jurisdictions that adopt it require the load report on submission, and a completed form with no report behind it is the failure inspectors see most often. IRC M1401.3 does carry an exception permitting capacity beyond the Manual S ranges for multistage and variable refrigerant flow equipment where the calculated loads fall inside the manufacturer’s specifications — but that is a documentation burden, not a blanket permission, so the builder still flags an over-range selection and names the exception in the finding.

The ASHRAE 99% heating dry bulb and 1% cooling dry bulb for the weather station nearest the house — the pair EPA and ENERGY STAR require for Manual J 8th edition. The 99% heating value is the temperature the location stays above for 99% of the year, so roughly 88 hours a year are colder; the 1% cooling value is exceeded for about the same 88 hours. Designing to the record low instead is one of the quieter routes to an oversized system: you size for a condition that occurs for a handful of hours a decade and then run the equipment badly for the other 8,700 hours a year. Indoors, Manual J uses 70°F for heating and 75°F for cooling at 50% relative humidity, with 45% as the dry-climate default and 55% reserved for genuinely humid climates.

Available static pressure times 100, divided by total effective length. Available static pressure is the blower’s rated external static pressure less the pressure drop of everything that is not duct or fitting — the coil at its wet-coil figure, the filter at its rated drop, and any balancing dampers, registers and grilles. Total effective length is the straight duct plus the equivalent lengths of the fittings on the critical path: the longest supply run plus the longest return run, not a tape-measure figure. A blower rated at 0.50 in. w.c. behind a 0.20 coil, a 0.10 filter and 0.03 of accessories leaves 0.17 in. w.c. available; over a 200 ft total effective length that is a friction rate of 0.085 in. w.c. per 100 ft, and every duct on the job is sized from that number.

Because Manual D does not publish a pass/fail band for it, and inventing one would be the same error as the sizing rules of thumb. The friction rate is an output of your specific blower, coil, filter and layout — the widely quoted 0.10 in. w.c. per 100 ft is the figure designers assume rather than compute, and ACCA’s own guidance calls that assumption out as the mistake. The builder computes the real number and prints it so you can size from it. The one duct verdict it does issue is unambiguous: when the coil, filter and accessory drops total more than the blower is rated for, there is no static pressure left to move air through any duct system at all, and no duct size can rescue that.

ASHRAE 62.2 sets it at Qtot = 0.03 × conditioned floor area + 7.5 × (bedrooms + 1), in cfm, with the bedroom count never taken below one. A 2,400 square foot house with three bedrooms needs 102 cfm. Worth knowing: the floor-area coefficient was 0.01 before addendum m to 62.2-2013, so an old spreadsheet gives 54 cfm for that same house and undersizes badly. Qtot is the total from infiltration plus the fan, and 62.2-2019 onward allows an infiltration credit that can reduce the fan rate below it — so the builder flags a shortfall as a design that owes a documented credit calculation rather than as a flat failure.

No. It is the designer’s record of the review, and every export says so. The citations are there to show why each figure was checked, not to certify the design — plan review and approval rest with the authority having jurisdiction, and the Manual J, S and D reports themselves still have to go with the permit application.

Your design checks its own sizing. Larry answers the phone while it does.

We will run your numbers on the call and tell you if the maths does not work for a shop your size. That happens, and it is a cheaper conversation than finding out three months in.

Get a demo